Volkswagen Beetle 2003 vs Volkswagen Beetle 1998
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 and Volkswagen Beetle 1998 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Beetle 2003 torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Beetle 1998. Volkswagen Beetle 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
By specification Volkswagen Beetle 2003 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Beetle 2003 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Beetle 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 1998. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
590 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Beetle 2003 and Volkswagen Beetle 1998 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 209 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 525 litres | |
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Beetle 2003 has 61 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle 1998. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |