Volkswagen Beetle 2003 vs Volvo V40 2016

 
Volkswagen Beetle
2003 - 2005
Volvo V40
2016 -
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 102 HP152 HP
Torque: 148 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds8.3 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Beetle engine produces 50 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 102 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Beetle reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.7no data
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
640 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 m4.37 m
Width: 1.72 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Beetle is smaller, but higher.
Volkswagen Beetle is 29 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres324 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1500 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Beetle has 54 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Beetle is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`740no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 340011 600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Beetle has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv