Volkswagen Beetle 2003 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Beetle engine produces 77 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Beetle reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Beetle consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Beetle could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Beetle 2003 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Beetle 2003 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Beetle is 29 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle has 54 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Beetle is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`700 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |