Volkswagen Beetle 2005 vs BMW Z4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volkswagen Beetle) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (BMW Z4) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Beetle engine produces 45 HP less power than BMW Z4, but torque is 40 NM more than BMW Z4. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Beetle reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Beetle is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Beetle consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Beetle over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Beetle consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Beetle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Beetle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Beetle is 1 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 201 litres | 240 litres | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle has 39 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Beetle is 1.1 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Volkswagen Beetle can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Volkswagen Beetle has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Beetle, so Volkswagen Beetle quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |