Volkswagen Beetle 2013 vs Mazda MX-5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Beetle engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda MX-5, but torque is 132 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Beetle reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Beetle is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Beetle consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Beetle over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Beetle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Beetle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Beetle engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle is larger. Volkswagen Beetle is 26 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 150 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Beetle has 75 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Beetle is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Volkswagen Beetle can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |