Volkswagen Beetle 1999 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2003
Body: | Hatchback | Cabrio | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Beetle 1999 and Volkswagen Beetle 2003 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Beetle 1999 torque is 2 NM less than Volkswagen Beetle 2003. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Beetle 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Beetle 1999 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Beetle 1999 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Beetle 1999 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
560 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Beetle 1999 and Volkswagen Beetle 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 209 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
525 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle 1999 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |