Volkswagen Beetle 2000 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2003
| Body: | Hatchback | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Beetle 2003, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Beetle 2003. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Beetle 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Beetle 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Beetle 2000 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Beetle 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 and Volkswagen Beetle 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 209 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
525 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |