Volkswagen Beetle 2000 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2003
| Body: | Hatchback | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Beetle 2000 and Volkswagen Beetle 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Beetle 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Beetle 2000 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Beetle 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 and Volkswagen Beetle 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 209 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
769 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |