Volkswagen Beetle 2000 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2003
Body: | Hatchback | Cabrio | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Beetle 2000 and Volkswagen Beetle 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
By specification Volkswagen Beetle 2000 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Beetle 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Beetle 2000 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 and Volkswagen Beetle 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 209 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
769 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle 2000 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle 2003. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`740 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |