Volkswagen Beetle 2011 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Beetle engine produces 45 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Beetle reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.4 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Beetle consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Beetle could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Volkswagen Beetle 2011 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Beetle 2011 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Beetle and Ford EcoSport are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
905 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 333 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Beetle is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Beetle is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Beetle scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Beetle has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |