Volkswagen Beetle 2016 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Chevrolet Epica is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Beetle engine produces 40 HP less power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Chevrolet Epica. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Beetle reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
Volkswagen Beetle is 51 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
905 litres | no data | |
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle has 170 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |