Volkswagen Beetle 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 210 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 320 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 12.1 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.9 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Volkswagen Beetle equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volkswagen Beetle is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle has 110 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`850 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |