Volkswagen Beetle 2016 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 220 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 6.8 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volkswagen Beetle is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
905 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle has 25 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 595 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`832 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |