Volkswagen Beetle 2016 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 220 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 6.8 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volkswagen Beetle is 51 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
905 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Volkswagen Beetle has 170 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`832 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |