Volkswagen Arteon 2020 vs BMW 5 series 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Volkswagen Arteon) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (BMW 5 series) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Arteon engine produces 28 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW 5 series. Despite less power, Volkswagen Arteon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.2 l/100km + 13.1 kWh/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 6.10 € | 10.40 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Arteon) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| BMW 5 sērija 2020 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2020 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Volkswagen Arteon is 10 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Arteon is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1632 litres | 1700 litres | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Volkswagen Arteon has 105 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 5 series (by 68 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Arteon is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`290 kg | 2`410 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`739 kg | 1`715 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 551 kg | 695 kg | |
| Volkswagen Arteon load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than BMW 5 series. Therefore, BMW 5 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 800 | 31 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Arteon has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |