Volkswagen Arteon 2020 vs BMW 6 series 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 268 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Arteon engine produces 10 HP more power than BMW 6 series, but torque is 50 NM less than BMW 6 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.1 | |
|
The BMW 6 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Arteon consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Arteon could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| BMW 6 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Arteon) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 6 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 6 sērija 2020 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 6 sērija 2020 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Volkswagen Arteon is smaller. Volkswagen Arteon is 23 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Arteon is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 563 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1557 litres | 1800 litres | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Volkswagen Arteon has 37 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 6 series (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Arteon is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Volkswagen Arteon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`450 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`672 kg | 1`785 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 498 kg | 665 kg | |
| Volkswagen Arteon load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than BMW 6 series. Therefore, BMW 6 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 34 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |