Volkswagen Amarok 2009 vs Ford Ranger 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 1`144 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |