Volkswagen Amarok 2011 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 62 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 15 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1773 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`820 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |