Volkswagen Amarok 2011 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Nissan Navara. Despite less power, Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`820 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Navara scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Navara scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |