Volkswagen Amarok 2011 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 2 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok and Mitsubishi L 200 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`820 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |