Volkswagen Amarok 2011 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 26 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Despite less power, Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.6 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 14 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`820 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |