Volkswagen Amarok 2022 vs Mazda BT-50 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 60 HP more power than Mazda BT-50, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Mazda BT-50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mazda BT-50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda BT-50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 217 mm (8.5 inches) | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda BT-50 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 8 cm longer than the Mazda BT-50, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`350 kg | 3`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`383 kg | 2`010 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 967 kg | 1`090 kg | |
| Volkswagen Amarok load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Mazda BT-50. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |