Volkswagen Amarok 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 26 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 16 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`040 kg | 2`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`894 kg | 1`855 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`146 kg | 995 kg | |
| Volkswagen Amarok load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Mitsubishi L 200. Therefore, Volkswagen Amarok is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |