Volkswagen Amarok 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Ford Ranger. Despite less power, Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 229 mm (9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 18 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`040 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`894 kg | 2`073 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`146 kg | 1`127 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |