Volkswagen Amarok 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 420 NM | 375 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 229 mm (9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.18 m | 5.36 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
Volkswagen Amarok is 18 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 3`200 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 18 800 | 18 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |