Volkswagen Amarok 2012 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 24 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 14 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok and Mitsubishi L 200 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |