Volkswagen Amarok 2012 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2014

 
Volkswagen Amarok
2012 - 2016
Chevrolet Tahoe
2014 -
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol6.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 160 HP426 HP
Torque: 300 NM624 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 266 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 324 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.512.1
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Amarok consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres98 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway920 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 203 mm (8 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.18 m5.18 m
Width: 1.94 m2.04 m
Height: 1.82 m1.89 m
Volkswagen Amarok and Chevrolet Tahoe are practically the same length.
Seats: 2 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data433 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data433 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2681 litres
Turning diameter: 13 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`040no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 17 00041 400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Amarok has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Chevrolet Tahoe has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv