Volkswagen Amarok 2017 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 37 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.2 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 232 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford Ranger version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Ford Ranger 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`900 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`949 kg | 1`883 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 951 kg | 1`317 kg | |
| Volkswagen Amarok load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 600 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Ranger has
| |