Volkswagen Amarok 2017 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 37 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Ranger. Despite less power, Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.3 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`920 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`027 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 893 kg | 1`050 kg | |
| Volkswagen Amarok load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 600 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |