Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 71 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 30 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 368 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`920 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 000 | 46 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |