Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Ford Ranger 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 54 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 229 mm (9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.71 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`920 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`053 kg | 1`946 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 867 kg | 1`254 kg | |
| Volkswagen Amarok load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 45 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |