Volkswagen Amarok 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`820 | 1`129 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |