Volkswagen Amarok 2010 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 103 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Navara scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Navara scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Navara has
| |