Volkswagen Amarok 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15 seconds | |
Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 24 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 14 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.3 | |
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.25 m | 5.19 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 19 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 2`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 18 200 | 11 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |