Volkswagen Amarok 2010 vs Mazda CX-9 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 113 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 67 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 12.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-9 2009: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 17 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |