Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 224 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 24 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`080 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |