Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Ford F150 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 224 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 542 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 101 HP less power than Ford F150, but torque is 8 NM more than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 11.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford F150 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is smaller. Volkswagen Amarok is 64 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 2192 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`080 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 55 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford F150 has
| |