Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 20 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Navara has
| |