Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 30 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 14 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 400 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |