Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 5 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.0 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 62 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 36 600 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |