Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 3 NM less than Nissan Navara. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |