Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 50 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.0 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 400 | 31 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |