Volkswagen Amarok 2009 vs Nissan Navara 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 3.0 (diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 180 HP | 190 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 420 NM | 403 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.2 seconds | 9.3 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.5 | 8.3 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, Volkswagen Amarok equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.23 m | 5.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`040 | ~ 2`873 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Navara scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Navara scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |