Volkswagen Amarok 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi L 200 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Amarok also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Volkswagen Amarok is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 - 180 HP | 136 - 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 420 NM | 314 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.5 seconds | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.6 | 7.7 - 8.7 | |
|
On average, Volkswagen Amarok equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 17 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`844 | ~ 2`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |