Volkswagen Amarok 2022 vs Mazda BT-50 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 3.0 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Volkswagen Amarok is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 302 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 600 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.3 | 7.7 - 8.0 | |
|
On average, Volkswagen Amarok equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 217 - 237 mm (8.5 - 9.3 inches) | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda BT-50 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 8 cm longer than the Mazda BT-50, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda BT-50, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`280 kg | ~ 3`067 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`280 kg | ~ 1`980 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`000 kg | ~ 1`087 kg | |
| Volkswagen Amarok load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Mazda BT-50. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |