Volkswagen Amarok 2022 vs Ford Ranger 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Ranger can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Amarok also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Ford Ranger is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 302 HP | 170 - 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 600 NM | 405 - 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.6 seconds | 7.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.3 | 3.2 - 13.8 | |
|
On average, a Volkswagen Amarok with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 217 - 237 mm (8.5 - 9.3 inches) | 226 - 266 mm (8.9 - 10.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok and Ford Ranger are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`280 kg | ~ 3`276 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`280 kg | ~ 2`434 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`000 kg | ~ 842 kg | |
| Volkswagen Amarok load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Volkswagen Amarok is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 51 000 | 41 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |