Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Amarok also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 258 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 580 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 13.7 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.3 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
On average, Volkswagen Amarok equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 62 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`029 | ~ 2`499 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 36 600 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |