Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.3 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 258 HP | 150 - 181 HP | |
Torque: | 340 - 580 NM | 380 - 430 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 13.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.3 | 7.6 - 8.6 | |
On average, Volkswagen Amarok equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.25 m | 5.27 m | |
Width: | 1.95 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 14 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`029 | ~ 2`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 36 400 | 28 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |