Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Ford Ranger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 258 HP | 130 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 580 NM | 330 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 13.7 seconds | 10.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.3 | 6.9 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, Volkswagen Amarok equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`029 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 30 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Ranger has
| |