Volkswagen Amarok 2016 vs Ford Ranger 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Amarok
2016 - 2020
Ford Ranger
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.2 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 163 - 258 HP130 - 200 HP
Torque: 400 - 580 NM330 - 470 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 - 10.9 seconds10.6 - 14.9 seconds
In general, Volkswagen Amarok are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Ranger. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.8 - 10.96.9 - 8.9
On average, Volkswagen Amarok equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 192 mm (7.6 inches)232 - 237 mm (9.1 - 9.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 5.25 m5.36 m
Width: 1.95 m1.86 m
Height: 1.83 m1.82 m
Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 13 metersno data
Gross weight: ~ 3`025 kg~ 3`200 kg
Net weight:~ 2`090 kg~ 1`997 kg
Load capacity:~ 935 kg~ 1`203 kg
Volkswagen Amarok load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 33 40023 800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Amarok has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
Ford Ranger has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • higher ground clearance
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv