VAZ 2109 1990 vs SAAB 9000 1991
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 100 NM | 294 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2109 engine produces 132 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 194 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 11.7 | |
The VAZ 2109 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2109 consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that by driving the VAZ 2109 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.01 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
VAZ 2109 is smaller. VAZ 2109 is 75 cm shorter than the SAAB 9000, 13 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 5.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the VAZ 2109 is 5.7 metres less than that of the SAAB 9000, which means VAZ 2109 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |